offending infidel
(
thefactofcreation.blogspot.com…)
Many aspects of the Darwinist deception regarding Tiktaalik Roseae, for long years the subject of speculation by Darwinists, have been exposed. Darwinist fraud, which we have maintained on the agenda so many times, has once again been revealed with new aspects. It has again been seen that people are being misled by Darwinists; TIKTAALIK ROSEAE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A SPECIES OF ALLIGATOR:
Firstly "Darwinist" is as silly a thing to label your enemy as a Neutonist, but alas I argue with an ass (a poet and.. well you know it). But yes it has been a long fourteen years since the unearthing of
Tiktaalik rosseae but no it is not an alligator.
- There are various very important facts about Tiktaalik Roseae that need to be known. The Tiktaalik Roseae fossil, that has to date been comprehensive depicted with odd-looking legs and even its whole body, reconstructions of which have been prepared and these fantastical reconstructions put on display in museums, and which has for years been described as an intermediate fossil in books, in fact CONSISTS SOLELY OF A SKULL. It doesn't, most of tiktaalik survives, but naturally as all creationists eventually must, when the truth doesn't suit you ignore it. From the rest of us hear on earth, hope you're having a nice trip.
- None of the bones added onto the skull belong to this life form at all, CONSISTING OF BONES BELONGING TO OTHER LIFE FORMS discovered in the same fossil-rich strata. Except that they (though admittedly broken) were found set in the matrix in such a way that is is highly unlikely that they are unassociated. but then again creationists are famous for being unable to see the forest through the trees.
- The fin fragments that have been attempted to be linked to this animal in fact belong to other fossil fishes living in the same strata. DELIBERATE ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO PORTRAY THESE AS BEING PART OF THE DISCOVERED SKULL. In this way, Tiktaalik Roseae has been turned into a false intermediate fossil.
- Therefore, all the speculation about the animal’s skull and the other parts added onto it is FALSE.
It is very convenient how you only use pictures of the specimen partially unearthed, but even if the skull is completely unrelated to the rest of the body, its the front limbs that really matter taxinomically speaking. The front limbs are a clear example of the relationship between tetrapods and the other lobe finned fishes.
- All the characteristics of the skull are CHARACTERISTICS BELONGING TO ALLIGATORS: The eyes being close to one another and located on the top of the head, the flat skull, the skull being able to move independently of the body, the sharp teeth and its general appearance are all specific to the alligators. In appearance, the animal IS IDENTICAL TO THE ALLIGATOR SINANSIS SPECIES LIVING IN today’s China.
eyes on top of its head, a flat, independently moving skull and sharp teeth are not specific to alligators by any reasonably definition of the word specific. you also neglect to explain how exactly a Chinese alligator waddled its ass to Nunavut.
- Indeed, one can see the fraud here from the account of the artist involved in the reconstruction of Tiktaalik Roseae. In reconstructing the fossil, the artist in question explicitly states that HE TOTALLY INVENTED THE CREATURE THROUGH THE POWER OF HIS IMAGINATION.
- Furthermore, the same artist stated that he determined the tissues of the animal in question and had no qualms about stating that a great deal of speculation was needed in order to produce a living appearance from a single fossil remain.
CITATION NEEDED, you don't really expect me to believe something just because you pulled it out of your ass, right?
- As we have seen, it is not at all hard for a Darwinist artist under the influence of evolution to turn a skull with entirely alligator characteristics into a very strange-looking, false transitional form. The Tiktaalik Roseae deception that has been going on for so many years has been seen by millions by means of this simple deceptive technique.
- Some people, lacking any great knowledge of the subject, may fall into the error of thinking that Darwinists behave scientifically, that an intermediate fossil has genuinely been found and that what is on display is what the animal really looked like. The fact is, however, that all that they have is an alligator skull, bones and fin fragments belonging to fish and other life forms discovered nearby the skull, and the power of imagination of an artist guided by tall tales of evolution. To sum up, Darwinists have deceived people yet again.
- Tiktaalik Roseaeis a false transitional fossil brought to the fore by Darwinists out of an urgent need at a time when they are in the worst despair and have begun being defeated. Just as with the Ida, Ardi and Austrolapithecus Sediba deceptions, which have recently visited such terrible humiliation on Darwinists.
- In fact,Tiktaalik Roseae is a perfect species of alligator, examples of which are still alive today. It lived 375 million years ago AND IS TOTALLY IDENTICAL TO THE LIVING SPECIES OF ALLIGATOR.
- This life form is in fact A LIVING FOSSIL THAT COMPLETELY DEMOLISHES DARWINISM.
Every individual living thing is a transitional form, that's kind of a key concept in evolutionary biology.
On the topic of alligators. Tiktaalik roseae is not an alligator, because it is not an archosaur, because it lacks cranial fanestra, something archosaurs are rather famous for. you may have noticed this if you actually looked at a the two skulls side by side, there is also the fact that tiktaalik has many small teeth (as is common in fish) whereas crocodilians have a comparatively small number of rather robust teeth. The most glaring over site in my opinion is that you failed to mention why tiktaalik has a third (Parietal) eye, this is a feature common in many types of fish and some tetrapods but is not present in archosaurs.
- So long as Darwinist speculation persists we will of course continue to issue clarifications regarding their intermediate fossil frauds. But the real issue is that Darwinists HAVE STILL NOT BEEN ABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR HOW A SINGLE PROTEIN MIGHT HAVE EMERGED SPONTANEOUSLY. Evolution collapses right at the phase of the very beginning of life.
- It is truly humiliating for Darwinists to offer deceptive accounts of a living thing whose fins turned into legs WHILE THEY ARE UNABLE TO EXPLAIN HOW A SINGLE PROTEIN MIGHT HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE, WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN DEFEATED AT THE VERY BEGINNING OF LIFE.
Abiogenisis is vary complex and not fully understood, but also outside the scope of evolution (you know the topic of your essay).
- More furore over yet another Darwinist deception has now blown up. But the deception has been completely exposed in all respects. Darwinists are left with no way out. Whenever they come up with a deception, that deception will inevitably be crushed. And we would once again remind the public that they are left speechless by even a single protein.
You literally have not presented any evidence against evolution, your arguments are, well not arguments at all.
- This is an immutable law of Allah. Our Lord reveals in one verse how falsehood will always be defeated:
With any luck you've got something right (for once).
Rather We hurl the truth against falsehood and it cuts right through it and it vanishes clean away! Woe without end for you for what you portray! (Surat al-Anbiya’, 18)
Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are the deaf and dumb who do not use reason.
(Surah Al-Anfal 8,22)